01
The product problem, not the homework problem
Teams do not need another essay about “AI is changing hiring.” They need a system that flags suspicious assistance on take-homes, packages evidence for reviewers, and fits beside existing coding or case platforms. That is what this landing covers; the playbook guide covers redesign tactics in depth.
02
What Honrly does on a take-home
Collect the submission in your normal workflow, attach authenticity observations, and route flagged work to human review. Reviewers see structured signals-not a vague “cheated” label-so they can advance, request a timed redo, or reject with a defensible record.
- Authenticity observations alongside content quality
- Review queues for recruiting and hiring-manager triage
- Retest paths when signals are ambiguous
03
Engineering take-homes vs PM and case take-homes
Coding homework fails when ghostwritten solutions cannot be explained. Product and strategy take-homes fail when decision logs and tradeoffs were never the candidate’s. Honrly’s integrity layer applies to both surfaces; the follow-up probe you schedule should match the role.
