01
Stakes are different in credentialing
Hiring mistakes are expensive. Credentialing mistakes can be dangerous. Programs need defensible integrity: clear policy, consistent candidate experience, accommodation paths, and reviewable evidence when outcomes are challenged.
- Remote delivery increases access-and increases assistance risk
- AI can draft constructed-response answers and coach through item banks
- Opaque “risk scores” without evidence are hard to defend in appeals
02
Honrly for exam operations
Use live or async monitoring depending on volume and stakes. Capture integrity timelines. Separate possible assistance from proven misconduct. Keep human review controls for escalations and accommodations.
- Session anomaly and assistance-oriented signals
- Structured evidence for reviewers and audit trails
- Versioned policies and exportable context for compliance teams
- No facial-expression personality scoring or appearance-based judgments
