Draft from the job
Traits and Skill Rank questions come from the posting, then you edit.
A catalog tells you they have seen the question. A job-specific assessment tells you they can do the work.
Traits and Skill Rank questions come from the posting, then you edit.
They answer on their time, with room to think. Questions come from the role.
Score, supporting quote, full response, session replay.
A broad catalog is a helpful starting point. Job-specific assessments go a step further: they ask about the work you actually need done, so a strong answer can show judgment as well as familiarity.
Paste the description. Honrly drafts traits and questions about judgment, craft, and how someone explains a decision. You send one link. They answer on their own time. Your team reads the score, the quote, and the full answer on that applicant.
TestGorilla and similar tools are strong catalogs, and many teams use them well. Honrly is designed so the assessment lives on the application, with one login and one review for your team.
The goal is to see how they frame a real hour of the job: what they protect, what they set aside, and what they would say to the customer.
Skill Rank questions are situations from the job. A senior engineer might meet a failing release. A product manager might meet a tradeoff between sales and reliability. A customer partner might meet an account that needs care. The answer is a window into how they think.
The model scores against the traits you set for that role, then shows the quote. If the quote feels thin, you will see that too. The number and the sentence stay side by side so your team can discuss them with care.
You are welcome to disagree. Structured hiring makes the judgment visible, and the last word stays with your team.
TestGorilla, iMocha, and Vervoe are excellent when the skill is standard: Excel, a language, a coding pattern. Honrly is shaped for the skill that is this company’s work.
We are glad to write a short set of questions that could only exist because you posted this role, and to file the answers where the application already lives.
One link. The role. The questions. Time to think. A clear path, with a video assessment only when you choose to send one. People who can do the job often appreciate the room to answer in their own words.
Principles
When two jobs share a question, it is because the work truly matches.
Honrly drafts. You keep what is true.
If the score is an 86, you can read the sentence that earned it.
Hiring managers can read everything in the same product.
Every role gets its own questions, written for that job. You can edit them before you send the link.
Yes. You interview the people whose answers you already understand.
Yes. Skill Rank and video both sit on the same role and the same applicant.
Short enough to finish. Long enough to show judgment. You control the questions.
It is closer to a structured screen than a weekend project. You are reading how someone thinks, with kindness for their time.
The next candidate is going to apply anyway.
Write the job. Send the assessment. Read the answers before you interview.